Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/Scheelky v. . Koch

Scheelky v. . Koch

25 S.E. 713, 119 N.C. 80
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 25 S.E. 713 (Scheelky v. . Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scheelky v. . Koch, 25 S.E. 713, 119 N.C. 80 (N.C. 1896).

Opinion

"If the lease had been surrendered with the understanding that it should be canceled" the plaintiff could not recover. Everett v. Williamson,107 N.C. 213, 214. The case stated fails to show any such understanding or consent on the part of the plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

Cited: Holton v. Andrews, 151 N.C. 341; Murrill v. Palmer, 164 N.C. 53.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monger v. . Lutterloh
142 S.E. 12 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)
Rucker v. Mason
1916 OK 961 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Higgins v. Street
1907 OK 80 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 713, 119 N.C. 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheelky-v-koch-nc-1896.