Scheel v. Long Island Rail Road

218 N.E.2d 338, 17 N.Y.2d 872, 271 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1281
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 218 N.E.2d 338 (Scheel v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scheel v. Long Island Rail Road, 218 N.E.2d 338, 17 N.Y.2d 872, 271 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1281 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the record presents questions of fact for a jury as to negligence and contributory negligence. As to the motion pictures put into evidence by plaintiffs, we hold that their admission was within the discretion of the trial court and not in itself erroneous. [For amendment of remittitur see 18 N Y 2d 684, decided July 7, 1966.]

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Scileppi and Keating. Judges Van Voorhis, Burke and Bergan dissent and vote to affirrp,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 N.E.2d 338, 17 N.Y.2d 872, 271 N.Y.S.2d 303, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scheel-v-long-island-rail-road-ny-1966.