Scheafer v. Target Corp.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 30, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-00651·Unknown

Opinion

1 Michelle A. Clark, Bar No. 243777 miclark@littler.com 2 Andrew H. Woo, Bar No. 261120 awoo@littler.com 3 Zoe Y. J. Monty-Montalvo, Bar No. 352595 zmontymontalvo@littler.com 4 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 5200 North Palm Avenue 5 Suite 302 Fresno, California 93704.2225 6 Telephone: 559.244.7500 Fax No.: 559.244.7525 7 Attorneys for Defendant 8 TARGET CORPORATION

9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 BYRON SCHEAFER, No. 2:24-cv-0651 DJC DB 13 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 14 ORDER v. 15 TARGET CORPORATION, and DOES 1 16 through 20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve 21 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 22 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting 23 this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and 24 petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 25 acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or 26 responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use 27 extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 28 treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set 1 forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them 2 to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141(e)(2)(i) sets forth the 3 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 4 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 5 2. DEFINITIONS 6 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 7 designation of information or items under this Order. 8 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless 9 of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection 10 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 11 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House 12 Counsel (as well as their support staff). 13 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information 14 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 15 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, 17 regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained 18 (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are 19 produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 20 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 21 matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve 22 as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 23 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this 24 action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 25 counsel. 26 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, 27 association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 28 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 1 party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have 2 appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has 3 appeared on behalf of that party. 4 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 5 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 6 support staffs). 7 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 8 Discovery Material in this action. 9 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 10 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 11 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 12 their employees and subcontractors. 13 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 14 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 15 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 16 Material from a Producing Party. 17 3. SCOPE 18 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 19 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted 20 from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of 21 Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or 22 their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred 23 by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any 24 information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party 25 or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result 26 of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 27 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the 28 Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the 1 disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation 2 of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall 3 be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4 4. DURATION 5 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 6 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise 7 in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the 8 later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; 9 and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and exhaustion of all appeals, 10 rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time limits for filing 11 any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 12 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 13 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for 14 Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection 15 under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 16 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 17 protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written 18 communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, 19 or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably 20 within the ambit of this Order. 21 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. 22 Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an 23 improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development 24 process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the 25 Designating Party to sanctions. 26 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that 27 it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 28 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 1 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided 2 in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 3 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 4 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 5 produced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scheafer v. Target Corp., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Scheafer v. Target Corp. (Scheafer v. Target Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)