Schayer v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schayer v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 370

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMarch 8, 1961

DocketNo. 65266; protest 59/25839 (Denver)

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 370 (Schayer v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schayer v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved cut diamonds and gold jewelry were manufactures of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Abstracts 47521 and 64361 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved cut diamonds and gold jewelry were manufactures of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Abstracts 47521 and 64361 followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schayer-v-united-states-cusc-1961.