Schayer v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Schayer v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 370

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Schayer v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 44 Cust. Ct. 134 →

United States Customs Court·Decided March 8, 1961·No. No. 65266; protest 59/25839 (Denver)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved cut diamonds and gold jewelry were manufactures of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Abstracts 47521 and 64361 followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved cut diamonds and gold jewelry were manufactures of the United States, having been returned to the United States after having been exported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that all of the applicable customs regulations had been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Abstracts 47521 and 64361 followed.

Schayer v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1961).

Pincite

46 Cust. Ct. 370 (Schayer v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.