Schaw v. . Schaw

Superior Court of North Carolina

Schaw v. . Schaw

1 N.C. 168

Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided July 5, 1799·Published

Opinion

By the Act of 1789, cap. 23, sec. 2. The administrator shall retain in his hands no more of the intestate's estate than amounts to his necessary charges and disbursements, and such debts as he may legally pay within two years after the administration granted. For actual expenditures, therefore, he is entitled to an allowance, but not for loss of time and personal services. Act of 1799, cap. 22; 3 P. Wil., 249.

NOTE. See Clarke v. Cotton, 17 N.C. 51.

Cited: Parker v. Grant, 91 N.C. 343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Act of 1789, cap. 23, sec. 2. The administrator shall retain in his hands no more of the intestate's estate than amounts to his necessary charges and disbursements, and such debts as he may legally pay within two years after the administration granted. For actual expenditures, therefore, he is entitled to an allowance, but not for loss of time and personal services. Act of 1799, cap. 22; 3 P. Wil., 249.

NOTE. See Clarke v. Cotton, 17 N.C. 51.

Cited: Parker v. Grant, 91 N.C. 343.

Schaw v. . Schaw, 1 N.C. 168 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

1 N.C. 168 (Schaw v. . Schaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related