Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107

277 F.2d 461
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 1960
Docket12990_1
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 277 F.2d 461 (Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schauffler v. Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers, Local 107, 277 F.2d 461 (3d Cir. 1960).

Opinion

277 F.2d 461

Bennet F. SCHAUFFLER, Regional Director of the Fourth Region
of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on
behalf of the National Labor Relations Board.
v.
HIGHWAY TRUCK DRIVERS & HELPERS, LOCAL 107, INTERNATIONAL
BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN AND
HELPERS OF AMERICA, and Warehouse Employees Union Local 169,
International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Appellants.

No. 12990.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Feb. 16, 1960.
Decided April 29, 1960.

Richard H. Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa. (Richard Kirschner, Wilderman & Markowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.

Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Jacques Schurre, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge and STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We are informed by counsel that the National Labor Relations Board has decided that no violation of Section 8(b)(4)(D), 29 U.S.C.A. 158, has been committed and that a motion for reconsideration has been denied. No substantial issue remains for our determination and it is obvious that the preliminary injunction appealed from is no longer vialble.

Accordingly we will vacate the judgment of the court below and remand the case to the end that the appellants may make application to the court below for the discharge of the preliminary injunction. 182 F.Supp. 556.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 F.2d 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schauffler-v-highway-truck-drivers-helpers-local-107-ca3-1960.