Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co.
This text of Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co. (Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRUCE SCHAUER, No. 75352 Appellant, vs. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. APR 1 6 2018 eRowm `111 A. CLEFti< 3UPRE:HE COURT ___521p-as„ 1.1 FY CLERIC ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a dismissal of an appeal to the district court from a small claims judgment. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Barry L. Breslow, Judge. Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev, Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh u. Gasazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Pickering
Gibbon!. Hardesty
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I94Th
g 11-1 LI 2- cc: Hon. Barry L. Breslow, District Judge Bruce Schauer Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk
(0) 1947A e 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schauer-v-geico-ins-co-nev-2018.