Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 2018·No. 75352·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRUCE SCHAUER, No. 75352 Appellant, vs.

GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY,

Respondent.

APR 1 6 2018

eRowm `111 A.

CLEFti< 3UPRE:HE COURT

___521p-as„

1.1 FY CLERIC

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a dismissal of an appeal to the district court from a small claims judgment. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Barry L. Breslow, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district courts have final appellate jurisdiction over cases arising in the justice courts. Nev, Const. art. 6, § 6; see also Waugh u. Gasazza, 85 Nev. 520, 521, 458 P.2d 359, 360 (1969). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, and we therefore ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Pickering

Gibbon!. Hardesty

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I94Th

g 11-1 LI 2-

cc: Hon. Barry L. Breslow, District Judge Bruce Schauer Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Reno Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A e 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co., (Neb. 2018).

Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co. (Schauer v. Geico Ins. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waugh v. Casazza
458 P.2d 359 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1969)