Schatzel v. Connelie

463 N.E.2d 372, 61 N.Y.2d 940, 474 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4176
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 20, 1984·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the petition dismissed.

Constitutionality of the provision of subdivision 3 of section 215 of the Executive Law, which authorizes the Superintendent to extend the age limit for State Police candidates, is presumed and that presumption has not been challenged on this appeal. The only question before us, therefore, is whether the Superintendent acted arbitrarily in extending the age limit for candidate Casey but refusing to do so with respect to the present petitioner. On the record before us we cannot say that the different treatment accorded was without rational basis.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schatzel v. Connelie, 463 N.E.2d 372, 61 N.Y.2d 940, 474 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4176 (N.Y. 1984).

463 N.E.2d 372 (Schatzel v. Connelie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson Ex Rel. Robinson v. Mount Sinai Medical Center
402 N.W.2d 711 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1987)
Feimer v. Ward
127 Misc. 2d 853 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Rotach v. Connelie
103 A.D.2d 937 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)