Schatzberg v. Schatzberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schatzberg v. Schatzberg

12 A.D.2d 483, 207 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 483 (Schatzberg v. Schatzberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schatzberg v. Schatzberg, 12 A.D.2d 483, 207 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment granting plaintiff separation from defendant husband and related relief on the ground of abandonment, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, without costs, as follows. The first decretal paragraph of the judgment is stricken and the complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff has failed to establish that the alleged abandonment was “ persistent and obstinate ” (Bohmert v. Bohmert, 241 N. Y. 446, 452). At the most there was a single, sudden argument leading to impulsive, ill-advised action by both parties. The fourth decretal paragraph is stricken and in place of its former provisions defendant is directed to pay $30 weekly to plaintiff at her residence for the support of their child, pursuant to the provisions of section 1170-a of the Civil Practice Act, the date of commencement of such payments to be fixed in the order to be entered herein. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. Settle order on notice. Appeal from order entered December 2, 1959, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the order, decree and judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on November 9,1959, and for a new trial, unanimously dismissed as academic. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment granting plaintiff separation from defendant husband and related relief on the ground of abandonment, unanimously modified on the law and on the facts, without costs, as follows. The first decretal paragraph of the judgment is stricken and the complaint is dismissed. Plaintiff has failed to establish that the alleged abandonment was “ persistent and obstinate ” (Bohmert v. Bohmert, 241 N. Y. 446, 452). At the most there was a single, sudden argument leading to impulsive, ill-advised action by both parties. The fourth decretal paragraph is stricken and in place of its former provisions defendant is directed to pay $30 weekly to plaintiff at her residence for the support of their child, pursuant to the provisions of section 1170-a of the Civil Practice Act, the date of commencement of such payments to be fixed in the order to be entered herein. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. Settle order on notice. Appeal from order entered December 2, 1959, denying defendant’s motion to vacate the order, decree and judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on November 9,1959, and for a new trial, unanimously dismissed as academic. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 483, 207 N.Y.S.2d 648, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schatzberg-v-schatzberg-nyappdiv-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack