Schatz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation

2019 ND 150, 929 N.W.2d 538
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJune 27, 2019
Docket20190068
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 ND 150 (Schatz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schatz v. N.D. Dep't of Transportation, 2019 ND 150, 929 N.W.2d 538 (N.D. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Michael Schatz appeals from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Department of Transportation ("DOT") decision suspending his driving privileges. On August 25, 2018, Schatz was pulled over by an officer with the Bismarck Police Department and arrested for driving under the influence. Schatz was issued a temporary operator's permit, and the officer's "Report and Notice Form" was forwarded to the DOT. Schatz requested an administrative hearing. Following the hearing, the hearing officer issued findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decision suspending Schatz's driving privileges for 91 days. Schatz argues the Report and Notice form did not sufficiently articulate reasonable grounds to believe Schatz was driving under the influence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7). See Sutton v. N.D. Dep't of Transp. , 2019 ND 132 , ¶ 8, 927 N.W.2d 93 .

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutton v. N.D. Dept. of Transportation
2019 ND 132 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 ND 150, 929 N.W.2d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schatz-v-nd-dept-of-transportation-nd-2019.