Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

273 S.W.3d 562, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1761
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 30, 2008·No. ED 91012·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

William Schatz, III, and Kellie Wilburn, individually and as personal representative of the estate of William Schatz, Jr. (“Plaintiffs”), appeal the judgment dismissing their petition against Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company and Kathleen D. Schatz, n/k/a Kathleen D. Rebmann for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We find that the trial court did not err in dismissing Plaintiffs’ petition.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 273 S.W.3d 562, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1761 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

273 S.W.3d 562 (Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cook
273 S.W.3d 562 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)