Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
This text of 273 S.W.3d 562 (Schatz v. COMMONWEALTH ANNUITY AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
William Schatz, III, and Kellie Wilburn, individually and as personal representative of the estate of William Schatz, Jr. (“Plaintiffs”), appeal the judgment dismissing their petition against Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company and Kathleen D. Schatz, n/k/a Kathleen D. Rebmann for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We find that the trial court did not err in dismissing Plaintiffs’ petition.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
273 S.W.3d 562, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schatz-v-commonwealth-annuity-and-life-insurance-company-moctapp-2008.