Schatz v. Celebrezze
346 F.2d 685
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 27, 1965
DocketNo. 519, Docket 29737
StatusPublished
This text of 346 F.2d 685 (Schatz v. Celebrezze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schatz v. Celebrezze, 346 F.2d 685 (2d Cir. 1965).
Opinion
We affirm in open court the judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York which affirmed an administrative order denying the appellant widow’s insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. This appeal is governed by Nott v. Flemming, 272 F.2d 380 (2 Cir. 1959), to which we adhere.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sophie Nott v. Arthur Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of America
272 F.2d 380 (Second Circuit, 1959)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
346 F.2d 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schatz-v-celebrezze-ca2-1965.