Schattler v. Wayne Circuit Judge

109 Mich. 567
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJune 17, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 109 Mich. 567 (Schattler v. Wayne Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schattler v. Wayne Circuit Judge, 109 Mich. 567 (Mich. 1896).

Opinion

The prosecuting attorney of Wayne county, on the relation of David Trombley, filed an information in quo warranto in the circuit court for said county, to test relator’s title to the office of supervisor of the township of Gratiot. Relator pleaded to the information, and replication was filed, an issue of fact being raised; whereupon the respondent, Judge Lillibridge, on motion of the informant and due notice to the relator, entered an order, under Circuit Court Rule No. 108 (104 Mich, iii.), placing the cause upon the docket of the then pending term for trial. Relator applied for mandamus to compel the vacation of this order, upon the ground that 2 How. Stat. § 7551, requires notice of trial of an issue of fact to be served at least 14 days before the first day of the term at which it is proposed to try the cause, and that the rule cited is in conflict with this statutory provision. The respondent contended that this section of the statute is not applicable to proceedings in quo warranto, but that the same are governed exclusively by chapter 298, 2 [568]*568How. Stat., and any rules of court adopted thereunder. Upon hearing, respondent’s contention was sustained, and the writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Berube v. Wheeler
87 N.W. 50 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 Mich. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schattler-v-wayne-circuit-judge-mich-1896.