Schatte, William Albert
This text of Schatte, William Albert (Schatte, William Albert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-81,195-06, WR-81,195-07, WR-81,195-08, WR-81,195-09 & WR-81,195-10
EX PARTE WILLIAM ALBERT SCHATTE, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. 23006, 23007, 23008, 23009 & 23010 IN THE 336TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FANNIN COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of four
aggravated sexual assaults of a child and sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment in each case.
He was also convicted of indecency with a child by contact and was sentenced to twenty years’
imprisonment in that case. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Schatte v. State,
Nos. 06-10-00166, 06-10-00167, 06-10-00168, 06-10-00169 & 06-10-00170 (Tex. App.—Texarkana
May 26, 2011) (not designated for publication). 2
This Court remanded these cases for findings addressing his claims that trial counsel rendered
ineffective assistance because, among other things, he did not convey a plea offer and did not advise
Applicant of the full range of punishment while advising Applicant that the jury would not sentence
him to more than six years’ confinement. While the writ applications were pending on remand,
Applicant supplemented his applications with a sixth claim, raising an additional ground of
ineffective assistance of counsel.
After a live hearing, the trial court made oral findings of fact and conclusions of law. This
Court has reviewed the record with respect to Applicant’s allegations. We agree with the trial court’s
recommendation and adopt its findings and conclusions. Based upon the trial court’s findings and
conclusions and our own review, we deny relief.
Filed: June 10, 2015 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Schatte, William Albert, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schatte-william-albert-texcrimapp-2015.