Scharlack v. Richmond Memorial Hospital

144 A.D.2d 354, 534 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 144 A.D.2d 354 (Scharlack v. Richmond Memorial Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scharlack v. Richmond Memorial Hospital, 144 A.D.2d 354, 534 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rich[355]*355mond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated May 21, 1987, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court, Richmond County, properly concluded that under the specific facts herein, the dismissal of the original timely action as against the defendant (see, Scharlack v Richmond Mem. Hosp., 127 AD2d 580) was inferentially for "neglect to prosecute” within the meaning of CPLR 205 (a) (Ivory v Ekstrom, 98 AD2d 763). Since the statutory six-month extension is not available, the plaintiff’s instant action is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations (see, CPLR 214 [former (6)]; 208). Accordingly, the defendant’s motion, which sought dismissal of the complaint upon that ground, was properly granted (Ivory v Ekstrom, supra). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carven Associates v. American Home Assurance Corp.
199 A.D.2d 104 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Ginsberg v. City of Long Beach
191 A.D.2d 478 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Kelly v. Rosenthal
176 A.D.2d 283 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 A.D.2d 354, 534 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scharlack-v-richmond-memorial-hospital-nyappdiv-1988.