Scharkopf v. Cadbury Schweppes, Inc.

698 N.E.2d 954, 91 N.Y.2d 1001, 676 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1366
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 14, 1998
StatusPublished

This text of 698 N.E.2d 954 (Scharkopf v. Cadbury Schweppes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scharkopf v. Cadbury Schweppes, Inc., 698 N.E.2d 954, 91 N.Y.2d 1001, 676 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1366 (N.Y. 1998).

Opinion

[1002]*1002Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the appeal from Supreme Court’s order denying appellant’s motion to reargue, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
698 N.E.2d 954, 91 N.Y.2d 1001, 676 N.Y.S.2d 125, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scharkopf-v-cadbury-schweppes-inc-ny-1998.