Scharff v. McCullough, McLeod & Co.

1 Gunby 31
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 31 (Scharff v. McCullough, McLeod & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scharff v. McCullough, McLeod & Co., 1 Gunby 31 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Gunby, J.

Where labor pay rolls, under the rules of a railroad company, are filed in its office, we consider them tantamount to an order to the company to pay the amounts due to the persons named therein, and the approval and filing of the rolls by the company work a complete assignment of the funds to the laborers, so that the contractor’s creditors cannot reach it by attachment.

2. If a garnishee answer evasively, his answers may be taken for confessed; if he answer falsely, his answers must be traversed within twenty days; in all other cases his liability is to be tested by his answers, and he cannot be held for more than he admits to be due. 27 An. 93; 12 An. 814.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Gunby 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scharff-v-mccullough-mcleod-co-lactapp-1885.