Scharf v. Scharf

5 A.D.2d 862, 172 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600

This text of 5 A.D.2d 862 (Scharf v. Scharf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scharf v. Scharf, 5 A.D.2d 862, 172 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to abridge the record on appeal so as to include only the court’s charge to the jury and the opinion setting aside the verdict is unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. (Cf. Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp., 225 App. Div. 587.) Of course, plaintiffs may still apply to this court for permission to file a typewritten record upon an adequate showing of the necessity therefor.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp.
225 A.D. 587 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 A.D.2d 862, 172 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scharf-v-scharf-nyappdiv-1958.