Scharf v. Scharf

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scharf v. Scharf

5 A.D.2d 862, 172 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1958·Published

Opinion

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to abridge the record on appeal so as to include only the court’s charge to the jury and the opinion setting aside the verdict is unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. (Cf. Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp., 225 App. Div. 587.) Of course, plaintiffs may still apply to this court for permission to file a typewritten record upon an adequate showing of the necessity therefor.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiffs’ motion to abridge the record on appeal so as to include only the court’s charge to the jury and the opinion setting aside the verdict is unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. (Cf. Moran v. Rainbow Appliance Corp., 225 App. Div. 587.) Of course, plaintiffs may still apply to this court for permission to file a typewritten record upon an adequate showing of the necessity therefor.

Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Scharf v. Scharf, 5 A.D.2d 862, 172 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

5 A.D.2d 862 (Scharf v. Scharf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related