Scharf v. Glasser
202 A.D. 823
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. It was error to exclude the evidence, offered by defendants, that the plaintiffs had failed to perform their contract, in that the goods manufactured were not in accordance with the sample, and were not tendered for delivery in time. (Dickinson v. Tysen, 209 N. Y. 395, 401; New York & N. H. Sprinkler Co. v. Andrews, 38 App. Div. 56.) Blackmar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Jaycox and Young, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scharf v. Glasser, 202 A.D. 823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).
202 A.D. 823 (Scharf v. Glasser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Irving Trust Co. v. Park & Tilford Import Corp.
250 A.D. 570 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)