Scharf v. Doe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scharf v. Doe

247 A.D. 882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1936

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 247 A.D. 882 (Scharf v. Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scharf v. Doe, 247 A.D. 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from picketing plaintiff’s jewelry store. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite, and denying defendants’ cross-motion for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs [883]*883and disbursements. No opinion. Present-—Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for a permanent injunction restraining defendants from picketing plaintiff’s jewelry store. Order granting plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite, and denying defendants’ cross-motion for an order dismissing the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs [883]*883and disbursements. No opinion. Present-—Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scharf-v-doe-nyappdiv-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack