Scharding v. Sherman & Sheppard, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scharding v. Sherman & Sheppard, Inc.

250 A.D. 860, 296 N.Y.S. 827, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9436

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 9, 1937·Published

Opinion

The complaint states a cause of action for the rescission of a sale of stock. Order denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or, in the alternative, to strike out certain allegations therein pursuant to rule 103, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The complaint states a cause of action for the rescission of a sale of stock. Order denying defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, or, in the alternative, to strike out certain allegations therein pursuant to rule 103, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Scharding v. Sherman & Sheppard, Inc., 250 A.D. 860, 296 N.Y.S. 827, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

250 A.D. 860 (Scharding v. Sherman & Sheppard, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.