Scharaga v. Sinram Bros.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Scharaga v. Sinram Bros.

275 A.D.2d 967

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 967 (Scharaga v. Sinram Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scharaga v. Sinram Bros., 275 A.D.2d 967 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

No triable issue is shown to exist as to the verity and conclusiveness of the documentary evidence upon which the defense is founded. It has been correctly held that the unsworn statement of a third person, submitted by respondent, does not reveal that any person, authorized by appellants to do so, made any representation as to respondent’s employment. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No triable issue is shown to exist as to the verity and conclusiveness of the documentary evidence upon which the defense is founded. It has been correctly held that the unsworn statement of a third person, submitted by respondent, does not reveal that any person, authorized by appellants to do so, made any representation as to respondent’s employment. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Sneed, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scharaga-v-sinram-bros-nyappdiv-1949.