Schapiro v. Schapiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schapiro v. Schapiro

277 A.D.2d 799

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 29, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 799 (Schapiro v. Schapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schapiro v. Schapiro, 277 A.D.2d 799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In a separation action, order granting respondent’s motion to require the appellant to furnish security for the payment of alimony under the decree modified on the facts by striking the words and figures, “ Twelve Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 ($12,500.00),” from the second ordering paragraph, and substituting in place thereof in words and figures, “ Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00).” As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The amount of the bond ordered to be furnished imposes an undue hardship, under all the facts and circumstances. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a separation action, order granting respondent’s motion to require the appellant to furnish security for the payment of alimony under the decree modified on the facts by striking the words and figures, “ Twelve Thousand Five Hundred and 00/100 ($12,500.00),” from the second ordering paragraph, and substituting in place thereof in words and figures, “ Five Thousand Dollars ($5000.00).” As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The amount of the bond ordered to be furnished imposes an undue hardship, under all the facts and circumstances. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 799, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schapiro-v-schapiro-nyappdiv-1950.