Schapira v. Amerex Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schapira v. Amerex Holding Corp.

247 A.D. 712

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Orders denying the respective motions of defendants-appellants to dismiss the second cause of action alleged in the amended complaint and to direct plaintiff to separately state and number the first alleged cause of action and to strike out certain portions of the amended complaint as irrelevant, etc., affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to modify by requiring the plaintiff to separately state and number the causes of action contained in the first alleged cause of action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders denying the respective motions of defendants-appellants to dismiss the second cause of action alleged in the amended complaint and to direct plaintiff to separately state and number the first alleged cause of action and to strike out certain portions of the amended complaint as irrelevant, etc., affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendants-appellants to answer within ten days after service of order upon payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to modify by requiring the plaintiff to separately state and number the causes of action contained in the first alleged cause of action.

Schapira v. Amerex Holding Corp., 247 A.D. 712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 712 (Schapira v. Amerex Holding Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.