Schaper v. Cleveland & Erie Railway Co.

108 A. 407, 265 Pa. 109, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 506
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 21, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 128
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 108 A. 407 (Schaper v. Cleveland & Erie Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaper v. Cleveland & Erie Railway Co., 108 A. 407, 265 Pa. 109, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 506 (Pa. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On August 23,1902, the appellant, who, with his wife, then owned a farm in Erie County, granted a right-of-way across it to the Conneaut & Erie Traction Company, the appellee’s predecessor in title. The railway extended from the City of Erie westwardly to the City of Conneaut, in the State of Ohio. In consideration of the grant the street railway company agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns, to sell round-trip tickets and hooks of tickets at certain rates, which were observed by the appellee until June 5, 1916, when, under schedules filed by it with the Interstate Commerce Commission, the Public Service Commission of Pennsylvania and the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, new rates or charges for round trip tickets and ticket books became operative. The appellant subsequently filed this bill for the specific performance by the appellee of the contract of the Conneaut & Erie Traction Company, its predecessor in title, to sell tickets at the rates fixed by the agreement of 1902, granting the right-of-way to the original company.

The contract which the appellant would specifically enforce was valid when made, but the parties to it entered into it subject to the power of the State to change the rates in the future, in the exercise of its governmental authority: Vide Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467, and cases there cited.

Appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmoele v. Atlantic City Railroad Co.
155 A. 143 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)
Miller v. West Penn Power Co.
11 Pa. D. & C. 4 (Fayette County Court, 1927)
Pittsburgh & Allegheny Telephone Co. v. Stinson Printing Co.
123 A. 818 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
New Street Bridge Co. v. Public Service Commission
76 Pa. Super. 6 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
City of Washington v. Public Service Commission
129 N.E. 401 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1921)
City of Scranton v. Public Service Commission
110 A. 775 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Slate Belt Electric Street Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission
73 Pa. Super. 493 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 A. 407, 265 Pa. 109, 1919 Pa. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaper-v-cleveland-erie-railway-co-pa-1919.