Schanzenbach v. Hodax

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Schanzenbach v. Hodax

154 A. 625, 9 N.J. Misc. 511, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 353

DecidedApril 23, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 154 A. 625 (Schanzenbach v. Hodax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schanzenbach v. Hodax, 154 A. 625, 9 N.J. Misc. 511, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 353 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action for negligence in the operation of motor vehicles.

The plaintiff has a verdict.

Both plaintiff and defendant have rules to show cause why the verdict should not he set aside.

The plaintiff urges a setting aside because his verdict is inadequate and the defendant urging that the verdict against him be set aside because it is against the weight of evidence, the charge of the court and the result of prejudie or sympathy and a compromise.

We think the situation is one where the verdict must be set aside and the rule made absolute and a venire de nova awarded as to all the issues. Such will be our order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI