Schantz v. Schantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schantz v. Schantz

175 A.D.2d 653, 573 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10201

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 12, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D.2d 653 (Schantz v. Schantz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schantz v. Schantz, 175 A.D.2d 653, 573 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In the circumstances of this case, the trial court’s distribution of the parties’ marital assets was not inequitable nor an abuse of discretion (see, Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — Divorce.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: In the circumstances of this case, the trial court’s distribution of the parties’ marital assets was not inequitable nor an abuse of discretion (see, Arvantides v Arvantides, 64 NY2d 1033).

We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Curran, J. — Divorce.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Green, Pine and Lowery, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D.2d 653, 573 N.Y.S.2d 939, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schantz-v-schantz-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack