Schanck v. Sniffen

1 Barb. 32
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 13, 1847·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Edmonds, J.

That clause ought not to be included in the injunction, unless special cause is shown therefor. It is not a matter of course thus to restrain a defendant, upon a mere suggestion of the fact that he is proceeding to obtain his discharge.

Injunction modified as to the clause objected to.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schanck v. Sniffen, 1 Barb. 32 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

1 Barb. 32 (Schanck v. Sniffen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryan v. . Spivey
13 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)