Schanck v. Sniffen
1 Barb. 32
Opinion
That clause ought not to be included in the injunction, unless special cause is shown therefor. It is not a matter of course thus to restrain a defendant, upon a mere suggestion of the fact that he is proceeding to obtain his discharge.
Injunction modified as to the clause objected to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schanck v. Sniffen, 1 Barb. 32 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).
1 Barb. 32 (Schanck v. Sniffen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bryan v. . Spivey
13 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)