Schanck v. Sniffen
1 Barb. 32
This text of 1 Barb. 32 (Schanck v. Sniffen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schanck v. Sniffen, 1 Barb. 32 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).
Opinion
That clause ought not to be included in the injunction, unless special cause is shown therefor. It is not a matter of course thus to restrain a defendant, upon a mere suggestion of the fact that he is proceeding to obtain his discharge.
Injunction modified as to the clause objected to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bryan v. . Spivey
13 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Barb. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schanck-v-sniffen-nysupct-1847.