Schaller v. Miller

173 A.D. 998, 159 N.Y.S. 1140
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the nonsuit, with costs. Held, defendant by mailing to plaintiff the letter containing the alleged libelous matter did not thereby publish the same, unless he had reason to believe that plaintiff’s wife or some other person would open and read the letter before it reached plaintiff. Plaintiff gave no such proof and hence did not prove publication. (Rumney v. Worthley, 186 Mass. 144.) All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaller v. Miller, 173 A.D. 998, 159 N.Y.S. 1140 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 998 (Schaller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Halio v. Lurie
15 A.D.2d 62 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Stella v. James J. Farley Ass'n
204 Misc. 998 (New York Supreme Court, 1953)
In re the Estate of Payne
160 Misc. 224 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)