Schaller v. KMart Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Schaller v. KMart Corp.

631 So. 2d 380, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004, 1994 WL 45111

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 1994

DocketNo. 92-1266

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 631 So. 2d 380 (Schaller v. KMart Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schaller v. KMart Corp., 631 So. 2d 380, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004, 1994 WL 45111 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Joan Schaller, plaintiff below, appeals the denial of her motion for new trial, asserting that the damages awarded to her were inadequate. A motion for new trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. White v. Martinez, 359 So.2d 7, 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). After careful consideration of plaintiffs arguments, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the new trial motion. See Griffis v. Hill, 230 So.2d 143, 145 (Fla.1969). This ruling moots the cross-appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Joan Schaller, plaintiff below, appeals the denial of her motion for new trial, asserting that the damages awarded to her were inadequate. A motion for new trial is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge. White v. Martinez, 359 So.2d 7, 8 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). After careful consideration of plaintiffs arguments, we conclude that there was no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s denial of the new trial motion. See Griffis v. Hill, 230 So.2d 143, 145 (Fla.1969). This ruling moots the cross-appeal.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

631 So. 2d 380, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1004, 1994 WL 45111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaller-v-kmart-corp-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack