Schallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein

219 U.S. 114, 31 S. Ct. 189, 55 L. Ed. 117, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1623
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 3, 1911
Docket445
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 219 U.S. 114 (Schallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schallenberger v. First State Bank of Holstein, 219 U.S. 114, 31 S. Ct. 189, 55 L. Ed. 117, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1623 (1911).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit by many banks to prevent the Banking Board of Nebraska from carrying out and enforcing an act similar to the Oklahoma statute just passed upon. It forbids banking except by a corporation formed under the act and provides for a guaranty fund. The Circuit Court held the statute unconstitutional and issued an injunction against the enforcement of it. 172 Fed. Rep. 999. For the reasons given in the foregoing case the decree of the Circuit Court'must be reversed.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santa Monica Beach, Ltd. v. Superior Court
968 P.2d 993 (California Supreme Court, 1999)
In Re the Estate of Hoagland
105 A.2d 825 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1954)
County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.
196 P.2d 773 (California Supreme Court, 1948)
Placek v. Edstrom
26 N.W.2d 489 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1947)
State ex rel. Mitchell v. Sage Stores Co.
141 P.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1943)
Dorsey v. Murphy
194 So. 603 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1940)
Priest v. Whitney Loan & Trust Co.
261 N.W. 374 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1935)
General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public Works
289 Mass. 149 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Lowell Co-operative Bank v. Co-operative Central Bank
191 N.E. 921 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
Nebbia v. New York
291 U.S. 502 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Christensen v. Merchants' & Marine Bank
150 So. 375 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Barry Brewer v. Wright
150 So. 186 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
Hubbell Bank v. Bryan
245 N.W. 20 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)
State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank
242 N.W. 278 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1932)
State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State Bank
237 N.W. 862 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1931)
Abie State Bank v. Weaver
227 N.W. 922 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1929)
State ex rel. Spillman v. Nebraska State Bank
225 N.W. 778 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1929)
Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.
278 U.S. 515 (Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 U.S. 114, 31 S. Ct. 189, 55 L. Ed. 117, 1911 U.S. LEXIS 1623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schallenberger-v-first-state-bank-of-holstein-scotus-1911.