Schalk v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Schalk v. State

960 S.W.2d 452, 332 Ark. 371, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 154

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 19, 1998

DocketCR 98-227

StatusPublished

This text of 960 S.W.2d 452 (Schalk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schalk v. State, 960 S.W.2d 452, 332 Ark. 371, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 154 (Ark. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Jerry Schalk, by his attorney, Teri Swicegood, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on her part.

We find such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Jerry Schalk, by his attorney, Teri Swicegood, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the transcript was tendered late due to an error on her part.

We find such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

960 S.W.2d 452, 332 Ark. 371, 1998 Ark. LEXIS 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schalk-v-state-ark-1998.