Schaible v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Schaible v. City of Cincinnati

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 1952·No. No. 32866·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the journal entry of the trial court setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial does not disclose the ground or grounds for such order, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making the order, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See Schwer, Admx., v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., 156 [514]*514Ohio St., 115, 100 N. E. (2d), 197, and Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co., 156 Ohio St., 1, 100 N. E. (2d), 211.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, O. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Since the journal entry of the trial court setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial does not disclose the ground or grounds for such order, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making the order, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See Schwer, Admx., v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., 156 [514]*514Ohio St., 115, 100 N. E. (2d), 197, and Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co., 156 Ohio St., 1, 100 N. E. (2d), 211.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, O. J., Zimmerman, Stewart, Middleton, Taft, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Schaible v. City of Cincinnati, 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 (Ohio 1952).

Pincite

157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 (Schaible v. City of Cincinnati) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.