Schaible v. City of Cincinnati
This text of 157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512 (Schaible v. City of Cincinnati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the journal entry of the trial court setting aside the verdict and judgment and granting a new trial does not disclose the ground or grounds for such order, and an examination of the record fails to disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in making the order, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. See Schwer, Admx., v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Rd. Co., 156 [514]*514Ohio St., 115, 100 N. E. (2d), 197, and Green v. Acacia Mutual Life Ins. Co., 156 Ohio St., 1, 100 N. E. (2d), 211.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 Ohio St. (N.S.) 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaible-v-city-of-cincinnati-ohio-1952.