Schager v. Durland

286 A.D.2d 725, 730 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8532
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 17, 2001·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Richard Marcus and Marilyn Marcus appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), dated August 12, 2000, as denied their motion to compel the plaintiffs to provide authorizations to obtain certain medical and other records.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The injured plaintiff placed his physical and mental condition in controversy. The Supreme Court therefore erred in denying the appellants’ motion (see, Prink v Rockefeller Ctr., 48 NY2d 309). Ritter, J. P., Altman, McGinity, Smith and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schager v. Durland, 286 A.D.2d 725, 730 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

286 A.D.2d 725 (Schager v. Durland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLouise v. S.K.I. Wholesale Beer Corp.
79 A.D.3d 1092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Diamond v. Ross Orthopedic Group, P.C.
41 A.D.3d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Avila v. 106 Corona Realty Corp.
300 A.D.2d 266 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Molesi v. Rubenstein
294 A.D.2d 546 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)