Schafler v. Newsome
This text of 125 F. App'x 110 (Schafler v. Newsome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Pepi Schafler appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) to with[111]*111draw reference of her Chapter 7 case to the bankruptcy court. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because “orders denying motions for withdrawal of reference are ... not final appealable orders.” Abney v. Kissel Co. (In re Kissel Co.), 105 F.3d 1324, 1325 (9th Cir.1997) (order). Accordingly, we dismiss Schafler’s appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
125 F. App'x 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schafler-v-newsome-ca9-2005.