Schafler v. Newsome
125 F. App'x 110
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 11, 2005·No. No. 03-17330; D.C. No. CV-03-05034-PJH·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Pepi Schafler appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying her motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) to with[111] draw reference of her Chapter 7 case to the bankruptcy court. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because “orders denying motions for withdrawal of reference are ... not final appealable orders.” Abney v. Kissel Co. (In re Kissel Co.), 105 F.3d 1324, 1325 (9th Cir.1997) (order). Accordingly, we dismiss Schafler’s appeal.
DISMISSED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schafler v. Newsome, 125 F. App'x 110 (9th Cir. 2005).
125 F. App'x 110 (Schafler v. Newsome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abney v. Kissel Co. (In re Kissel Co.)
105 F.3d 1324 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)