Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA

Fourth Circuit

Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA

582 F. App'x 194

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2014·No. No. 14-1509·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order entering judgment on a pending writ of garnishment on two of Schafler’s bank accounts to satisfy a judgment of attorney’s fees and costs against her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order entering judgment on a pending writ of garnishment on two of Schafler’s bank accounts to satisfy a judgment of attorney’s fees and costs against her. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA, 582 F. App'x 194 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

582 F. App'x 194 (Schafler v. HSBC Bank USA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.