Schafler v. Field

Fourth Circuit

Schafler v. Field

475 F. App'x 27

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1430

StatusPublished

This text of 475 F. App'x 27 (Schafler v. Field) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schafler v. Field, 475 F. App'x 27 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging civil conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schafler v. Field, No. 8:12-cv-00715-PJM, 2012 WL 959396 (D.Md. Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pepi Schafler appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging civil conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schafler v. Field, No. 8:12-cv-00715-PJM, 2012 WL 959396 (D.Md. Mar. 20, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

475 F. App'x 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schafler-v-field-ca4-2012.