Schaffer v. State
295 S.W.3d 903, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1555, 2009 WL 3571338
Opinion
ORDER
Daniel Schaffer appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Schaffer asserts that the trial court clearly erred in failing to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law on his pro se claims incorporated into the amended motion. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schaffer v. State, 295 S.W.3d 903, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1555, 2009 WL 3571338 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
295 S.W.3d 903 (Schaffer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
WATIE v. State
295 S.W.3d 903 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)