Schaffer v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Schaffer v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.

24 A.D.2d 667, 261 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3661

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 24 A.D.2d 667 (Schaffer v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Schaffer v. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc., 24 A.D.2d 667, 261 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3661 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appellant asserts that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting into evidence a report of a blood sample. In this case the oral evidence and the physical facts strongly support the jury’s verdict. While the handling of the specimen here involved leaves much to be desired, in view of the other proof we do not find that in this civil case its admittance amounts to reversible error. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appellant asserts that the trial court committed reversible error in admitting into evidence a report of a blood sample. In this case the oral evidence and the physical facts strongly support the jury’s verdict. While the handling of the specimen here involved leaves much to be desired, in view of the other proof we do not find that in this civil case its admittance amounts to reversible error. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 667, 261 N.Y.S.2d 206, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaffer-v-oneida-motor-freight-inc-nyappdiv-1965.