Schaffer v. Northeast Co.
259 A.D. 732, 18 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6459
Opinion
Motion to strike out undertaking on appeal denied, without costs. The undertaking furnished complies with the statute and is sufficient. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 594; Hotop v. Maryland Casualty Co., 274 N. Y. 327.) In so far as plaintiff, on defendant’s appeal to this court, may ask that the jury’s verdict be reinstated, plaintiff is in the position of an appellant prosecuting a cross-appeal. Defendant is not required to post a bond to protect plaintiff on his cross-appeal. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schaffer v. Northeast Co., 259 A.D. 732, 18 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).
259 A.D. 732 (Schaffer v. Northeast Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hotop v. Maryland Casualty Co.
8 N.E.2d 879 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)