Schaffer v. Northeast Co.

259 A.D. 732, 18 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6459

This text of 259 A.D. 732 (Schaffer v. Northeast Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaffer v. Northeast Co., 259 A.D. 732, 18 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Motion to strike out undertaking on appeal denied, without costs. The undertaking furnished complies with the statute and is sufficient. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 594; Hotop v. Maryland Casualty Co., 274 N. Y. 327.) In so far as plaintiff, on defendant’s appeal to this court, may ask that the jury’s verdict be reinstated, plaintiff is in the position of an appellant prosecuting a cross-appeal. Defendant is not required to post a bond to protect plaintiff on his cross-appeal. Present —■ Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hotop v. Maryland Casualty Co.
8 N.E.2d 879 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.D. 732, 18 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaffer-v-northeast-co-nyappdiv-1940.