Schaffer v. Fischer

105 A.D.3d 1287, 963 N.Y.S.2d 607

This text of 105 A.D.3d 1287 (Schaffer v. Fischer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaffer v. Fischer, 105 A.D.3d 1287, 963 N.Y.S.2d 607 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

A sample of petitioner’s urine twice yielded a positive urinalysis test result, and he was accordingly charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting drug use. He was found guilty as charged following a tier III disciplinary hearing, and his administrative appeal was unsuccessful. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, test documentation and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Davis v Fischer, 98 AD3d 1154, 1155 [2012]; Matter of Blake v Fischer, 87 AD3d 771, 772 [2011]). The testimony of the officers involved further established that a proper chain of custody over the sample was maintained, notwithstanding that the relevant documentation was not signed by the officers and incorrectly noted the date when the sample was taken (see Matter of Davis v Fischer, 98 AD3d at 1155; Matter of Geraci v Fischer, 63 AD3d 1467, 1468 [2009]; Matter of Patterson v Goord, 266 AD2d 611, 611 [1999]). Petitioner’s related challenge to the adequacy of the misbehavior report, to the extent it is properly before us, has been examined and found to lack merit.

Peters, P.J., Mercure, Lahtinen and Stein, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geraci v. Fischer
63 A.D.3d 1467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Blake v. Fischer
87 A.D.3d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Davis v. Fischer
98 A.D.3d 1154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Patterson v. Goord
266 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A.D.3d 1287, 963 N.Y.S.2d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaffer-v-fischer-nyappdiv-2013.