Schaffer v. City of St. Paul
This text of 43 N.W. 65 (Schaffer v. City of St. Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action is brought by plaintiff to recover damages against the city of St. Paul for diverting the course of a stream of water which ran through plaintiff’s lot, and the; only question litigated and considered in the case was that of damages. Upon this there was a wide diversity in the testimony, and the court was of the opinion that the verdict for the amount rendered was not justified by the evidence, and granted a new trial. In this we find no^ abuse of discretion, and in conformity with the settled rule of this court applicable in such cases the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 N.W. 65, 41 Minn. 310, 1889 Minn. LEXIS 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaffer-v-city-of-st-paul-minn-1889.