Schafer v. Vizena
This text of 15 N.W. 675 (Schafer v. Vizena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence of the garnishees disclosed that the defendant had been employed by them to build and complete an elevator, at a given price per thousand feet of the lumber put into the structure. He abandoned the work-before its completion, without cause, so far as appears, leaving a number of his employes, who had worked on the building, unpaid in'an amount exceeding the balance due defendant, estimated by the amount of lumber already used. The examination of the garnishees left the question of the extent of their liability to such employes, who, it appears, were cont emplating filing liens on the building, (the time for which had not elapsed,) open and uncertain. Whether as to liens, the amount of which is left unascertained, a continuance might not properly have been allowed, to enable plaintiff to ascertain more accurately the facts in reference thereto, we are not required to determine. The case was voluntarily submitted upon the evidence of the garnishees, and the sole question is upon its sufficiency. Independently, therefore, of the question of the rights and defences of the garnishees under the contract, which they claim was an entire one and was wil-fully violated by defendant, it was not made clearly to appear, upon the case as submitted, that the garnishees should be charged in any sum, and the order discharging them should.be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 N.W. 675, 30 Minn. 387, 1883 Minn. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schafer-v-vizena-minn-1883.