Schafer v. Schafer

224 A.D.2d 1024, 638 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 2, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 224 A.D.2d 1024 (Schafer v. Schafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schafer v. Schafer, 224 A.D.2d 1024, 638 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without [1025]*1025costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in awarding plaintiff counsel fees of $3,000 and disbursements in the amount of $533.04 (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881; see also, DiSanto v DiSanto, 198 AD2d 838, 839). Contrary to the contention of defendant, it is not necessary in a matrimonial action for plaintiff to exhaust her resources in order to be entitled to an award of counsel fees (see, Behrmann v Behrmann, 204 AD2d 1076). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Genesee County, Wolf, Jr., J.— Counsel Fees.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dougherty v. Dougherty
236 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 A.D.2d 1024, 638 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schafer-v-schafer-nyappdiv-1996.