Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Schaeffer v. Upjohn Co.

Schaeffer v. Upjohn Co.

197 A.D.2d 446, 604 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9815
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 21, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 197 A.D.2d 446 (Schaeffer v. Upjohn Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schaeffer v. Upjohn Co., 197 A.D.2d 446, 604 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about October 27, 1992, which granted a motion by defendant for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s amended verified complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Because plaintiff utterly failed to controvert her mother’s sworn and unequivocal testimony that she ingested DES manufactured by a company other than defendant, summary judgment was proper (Hymowitz v Eli Lilly & Co., 73 NY2d 487, 504-505). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Carro, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Veitch
28 A.D.3d 1079 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A.D.2d 446, 604 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaeffer-v-upjohn-co-nyappdiv-1993.