Schaeffer v. Schaeffer

546 A.2d 344, 15 Conn. App. 820, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 317
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided June 30, 1988·No. 6184·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have carefully examined the records, transcripts and briefs submitted to us on this appeal. After affording the plaintiff’s claims of error the appropriate scope of review, to the extent that they have been properly presented, we conclude that the trial court correctly applied the law to the evidence. We cannot retry the case. Stiepel v. Cone, 14 Conn. App. 815, 541 A.2d 547 (1988).

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schaeffer v. Schaeffer, 546 A.2d 344, 15 Conn. App. 820, 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 317 (Colo. Ct. App. 1988).

546 A.2d 344 (Schaeffer v. Schaeffer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stiepel v. Cone
541 A.2d 547 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)