Schaeffer v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission
Opinion
Schaeffer appeals Commission action establishing his presumptive parole release date. We affirm.
Whether credit is given for time on parole is within the Commission’s discretion. Section 947.21, Florida Statutes (1981); Coleman v. Wainwright, 323 So.2d 581 (Fla.1975).
The Commission correctly aggregated Schaeffer’s times after including a point for a parole revocation in his second commitment, Nord v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com’n, 417 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Schaeffer’s ex post facto argument is controlled by our opinions in Lopez v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com’n, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), and May v. Fla. Parole & Probation Com’n, 424 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
434 So. 2d 44 (Schaeffer v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.