Schaeffer v. Adex Corp.
This text of 598 F. App'x 195 (Schaeffer v. Adex Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Todd Schaeffer appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim, denying his motion for judgment, and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schaeffer v. ADEX Corp., No. 1:14-cv-01127-TSE-TCB (E.D.Va. Nov. 25, 2014; Dec. 19, 2014; Dec. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 F. App'x 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaeffer-v-adex-corp-ca4-2015.