Schaeffer v. Adex Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Schaeffer v. Adex Corp.

598 F. App'x 195

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2015·No. No. 15-1058·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Todd Schaeffer appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim, denying his motion for judgment, and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schaeffer v. ADEX Corp., No. 1:14-cv-01127-TSE-TCB (E.D.Va. Nov. 25, 2014; Dec. 19, 2014; Dec. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Todd Schaeffer appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim, denying his motion for judgment, and denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schaeffer v. ADEX Corp., No. 1:14-cv-01127-TSE-TCB (E.D.Va. Nov. 25, 2014; Dec. 19, 2014; Dec. 31, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Schaeffer v. Adex Corp., 598 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

598 F. App'x 195 (Schaeffer v. Adex Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.