Schaefer v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY
This text of 278 S.W.3d 201 (Schaefer v. WESTERN SURETY COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Roland K. Schaefer appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his cause of action against Western Surety Company on the grounds that the lawsuit was barred by the applicable three-year statute of limitations set forth in Mo.Rev.Stat. § 516.130(1) (2000). We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court correctly found that Schae-fer’s claim was time-barred by Mo.Rev. Stat. § 516.130(1). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 S.W.3d 201, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-v-western-surety-company-moctapp-2008.