Schaefer v. Werling
60 N.E. 149, 156 Ind. 704, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 112
Opinion
As the ground for reversal, appellant contends that the “Barrett law” is unconstitutional. The majority of the court held otherwise in Adams v. City of Shelbyville, 154 Ind. 467. On the authority of that decision, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Schaefer v. Werling, 60 N.E. 149, 156 Ind. 704, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 112 (Ind. 1901).
60 N.E. 149 (Schaefer v. Werling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stingily v. City of Jackson
104 So. 465 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
Martin v. Wills
60 N.E. 1021 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)