Schaefer v. Werling
60 N.E. 149, 156 Ind. 704, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 112
This text of 60 N.E. 149 (Schaefer v. Werling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Schaefer v. Werling, 60 N.E. 149, 156 Ind. 704, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 112 (Ind. 1901).
Opinion
As the ground for reversal, appellant contends that the “Barrett law” is unconstitutional. The majority of the court held otherwise in Adams v. City of Shelbyville, 154 Ind. 467. On the authority of that decision, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stingily v. City of Jackson
104 So. 465 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1925)
Martin v. Wills
60 N.E. 1021 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 N.E. 149, 156 Ind. 704, 1901 Ind. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schaefer-v-werling-ind-1901.